ICEI in a nutshell

Good Afternoon. I'm almost fully recovered. I can't be completely healthy cause of the horrible burocracy present in journalism, it's hard to come to terms with. But well, Here we are giving it the last effort.

There are a lot of things that need to change in ICEI.

First: the "teachers". There are good ones, really pacient ones, they have a good teaching methods, respect their students, etc. But there other teachers who are sexist, indifferent, bad at teaching, arrogants and overall bad people, they do an awful job and receive a good salary.

Second: the standingpoint, the perspective. ICEI have a anachronistic perspective, Here still teaching us the new journalism with its standard, Gabriel García Márquez. There are not much interest in teaching us about data journalism. I don't know that they (ICEI executives) don't know that where are the money is in data journalism, an unfinished field.

Third: Electivos de Formación Básica. The good trades are minority. There are very much trades that are so boring, a unnecesary content and the worst; We take this trades only for acummulate credits. Even worst, we have to acummulate sixteen. In ocassions, they are an obstacle, a head pain.

Fourth: Photograph. Before 2016, in the curricular map had two trades of photograph. The "brilliant idea" from "tercer piso" was join together these subject in one. Nobody was conformed when they inform that the last year had two subject of photograph.

Fifth: Subject registration. Bad made since the start. Always have a adversely affect, because don't have vacants, registered with a bad teacher, etc

In conclusion, ICEI belong to Universidad de Chile, however is inffected of mediocrity, where its executive doesn't to see this problem, even when the students show it in its face. An stress factory.